“When faith and power intertwine, how will our Climate, Ecological (Green) vision, and Adaptive Resiliency survive?”
Introduction and Context
It is about Christian Nationalists and now they are a large part of our government: Why I share posts like this, well they are the ones who will be running our government so it is important to understand who they are and what they represent.
We live in an era where every policy, every decision, and every vote has a ripple effect on our shared destiny. As more leaders with strong Christian Nationalist beliefs take on key roles within government, the choices they make can shape the way we respond to the Climate crisis, the way we protect vulnerable communities, and whether we embrace Ecological (Green) innovations that foster a healthier planet. These leaders do not simply hold personal religious views; rather, they often push for a future where one specific vision of faith and nationhood overrides other perspectives. Understanding their guiding principles matters greatly because their beliefs could influence how we teach science to our children, how we care for our neighbors, and whether we invest in Adaptive Resiliency measures that help us survive intensifying natural disasters.
Peering Into Their Worldview
Christian Nationalists typically argue that the nation’s founding, identity, and destiny are tied to a specific Christian heritage. They believe that laws, culture, and public life should reflect this tradition above all others. At first glance, this might not seem directly related to the Climate emergency or the need for Ecological (Green) solutions. Yet, their worldview often leads them to value certain ideas—like strict national borders and loyalty to old-fashioned energy industries—over the urgent need to address rising temperatures and mass species loss. Some Christian Nationalists may distrust scientific evidence, or see environmental protections as obstacles to economic growth, personal freedoms, or what they view as a “divinely inspired” national purpose.
If we hope to steer ourselves through the storms ahead—both literal and figurative—we need leaders willing to listen to scientists and consider other cultures’ insights. If we choose policymakers who think human efforts to ease the Climate crisis are pointless, believing only divine will can shape our fate, we lose time and ground. While faith can be a powerful personal guide, it becomes risky when officials rely on it alone to form environmental policies that affect millions. Failing to recognize how climate patterns are changing, or dismissing the research that shows we must act now, can weaken our Adaptive Resiliency and leave future generations struggling to survive.
Intersections of Faith, Power, and Policy
In a government influenced by Christian Nationalist thought, we may see fewer laws that guard against pollution, protect forests, or preserve clean water. Policies that support solar panels, wind turbines, and regenerative farming might be set aside in favor of practices that reward large corporations dealing in coal, oil, or single-crop monocultures that damage the soil. This approach can slow down our transition to cleaner energy sources and keep us tied to old systems that harm the environment.
A government guided by these beliefs might also limit certain teachings in schools. Instead of discussing the science of Climate change, students could be told that natural disasters are inevitable tests of faith, that nothing humans do can alter the rising seas or fierce storms. Such narrow instruction deprives young people of the chance to learn how our planet works—or what we can do to save it. Over time, this can weaken not only our scientific understanding but also our moral resolve to help communities in need and preserve the Earth’s delicate balance.
Real-Life Stories and Warning Signs
Imagine a farming region facing constant drought. The families there rely on crops for their income and food, but the rain patterns have changed. Desperate for help, they turn to their elected leaders, hoping for laws that fund smart irrigation, sustainable water use, or soil regeneration programs. If those in power rely on Christian Nationalist views that frame the drought as divine will, they may suggest prayer gatherings instead of policy changes. Although prayer and faith can comfort communities in hard times, it does not replace the careful planning required to secure future harvests. Without forward-thinking solutions, the fields will dry out even more, and families may be forced to leave their land behind.
Or consider a coastal city where fierce hurricanes strike more often than ever before. The science behind stronger storms and rising seas is clear. We know that human activities—like burning fossil fuels—add greenhouse gases to our atmosphere, trapping heat and fueling extreme weather. In a government led by Christian Nationalists who question scientific findings and resist global cooperation, the city might not receive support for updated building codes, shoreline restoration, or flood defenses. Instead of developing Adaptive Resiliency—for instance, planting mangroves that protect shorelines, improving drainage systems, or encouraging elevated housing—leaders might cling to a belief that human efforts are futile. As a result, each passing storm leaves more ruin, and the cycle of destruction continues.
Guarding Against Narrow Views in a Connected World
Our planet’s troubles do not respect national borders. Pollution flows between countries, wildlife migrates across continents, and greenhouse gases shift the climate patterns of the entire globe. Addressing these problems is a shared task that calls for broad cooperation. Treaties, global summits, and cross-border projects are steps toward solutions that help everyone.
Yet, Christian Nationalists may see international agreements as threats to national sovereignty or religious identity. For example, efforts to join Climate accords or participate in wildlife protection treaties might be cast as attempts by “outsiders” to control domestic policies. This thinking can lead to isolation, preventing communities from benefiting from shared research and solutions. Without open dialogue, we lose the chance to learn from other countries that have found ways to harness wind power effectively, restore coral reefs, or blend traditional wisdom with cutting-edge technology to achieve real, lasting Ecological (Green) progress.
A Clash of Moral Duties
Some Christian Nationalists insist that their role is to defend the nation’s perceived religious character above all else. But people of faith, including many Christians, hold a wide range of views. A large number agree that caring for Creation—protecting the environment, ensuring clean water, and leaving a stable Climate for our children—is a moral responsibility. These faithful stewards consider it a sacred duty to honor the Earth as a gift that sustains all life.
Meanwhile, scientists who work with communities on the front lines of Climate change know the clock is ticking. If we delay action, we could reach tipping points where damage to forests, oceans, and farmland becomes almost impossible to reverse. More and more young leaders of faith, along with environmental advocates, plead with those in power to understand that denying Climate science does not only harm political rivals or those who think differently—it harms every living thing, including the families and fellow believers these leaders claim to protect.
The Power of Knowledge, Dialogue, and Compassion
The world needs people willing to listen and learn. When communities gather in town halls, meet with local representatives, or form study groups to explore better farming practices, they open their minds to new ideas. Instead of shutting out facts, they welcome them. Instead of rejecting global cooperation, they try to see how it can help everyone. Teaching the next generation to respect knowledge, understand complex problems, and treat others with kindness can counter the rigid thinking that comes with certain forms of Christian Nationalism.
“Stubbornness will not shelter us from reality,” says Dr. Linus Gray, a fictional coastal researcher who has spent decades studying how rising seas reshape shorelines. “If we are too proud to consider new facts, or too loyal to a single idea to act, then we fall behind as the tides move forward. True wisdom comes from admitting when our old ways no longer serve us and daring to shape new solutions.”
Adaptive Resiliency: A Path Forward
We must commit to building Adaptive Resiliency, both in how we design our cities and in how we think. Adaptive Resiliency means staying flexible and open-minded, ready to shift strategies as we learn more. It means investing in research to understand which crops handle drought best, which renewable energy systems are most reliable, and how to restore wetlands that can filter water and prevent floods. It also means welcoming new voices—teachers, youth leaders, farmers, scientists, business owners, faith leaders who value stewardship—and weaving their insights together into policies that make sense and last.
But if Christian Nationalists holding power believe only their religious narrative counts, we may lose this sense of shared purpose. Instead of embracing complexity, they may cling to simple slogans that shut down conversation. Instead of leading bold changes to reduce emissions, they may double down on fossil fuels. Instead of teaching students that Climate and Ecological (Green) challenges demand cooperation and care, they may present them as distractions from what they see as the nation’s true calling. If we allow this to happen, our capacity to adapt to a rapidly changing world fades.
Persuasion With Evidence and Empathy
Changing minds is rarely easy, but it is possible. When we show that Ecological (Green) solutions do not just protect nature—they also create jobs, stabilize farming communities, and improve public health—some skeptics may listen. When we emphasize that working with other countries is not about giving up control but about gaining knowledge and strength, even those wary of global alliances might reconsider.
By respectfully talking through these issues, holding public forums, and encouraging faith leaders who value stewardship, we can make a difference. We can say, “Let’s keep what is good in our traditions but also make sure we learn from mistakes. Let’s build a future where faith does not blind us to facts, and where patriotism does not mean rejecting the wisdom of others.”
Looking Beyond Today
The rise of Christian Nationalists in government raises hard questions about where we are going. Will we respond to the Climate crisis with courage and innovation, or with closed minds and folded arms? Will we invest in our children’s future by teaching them that the Earth’s systems are worth protecting, or will we pass along unbalanced views that ignore the challenges ahead?
Our answer lies in our willingness to see the bigger picture. Climate change, resource scarcity, and pollution do not care about human borders or human arguments. These problems need to be solved, or else we all suffer. By understanding Christian Nationalist beliefs, we stand a better chance of engaging in meaningful dialogue, seeking common ground, and persuading policymakers that defending life and nurturing the Earth is not a luxury—it is our shared duty.
We must not allow one narrow lens to set the course for everyone’s future. Instead, we must hold our leaders accountable, insist on using facts, and keep faith as a personal source of strength—not as a rigid rulebook that denies the realities we face. In doing so, we honor the best in ourselves: our ability to learn, to care, and to choose cooperation and reason over fear and division.
By remaining honest, respectful, and persistent, we can work toward a more balanced and hopeful tomorrow. We can still protect our planet and build a society that respects both wisdom and moral courage, ensuring that future generations inherit a world worth saving.
Tito